10 Comments

Great piece, Russ! Well done.

Expand full comment

And this is why I contend the MSM is complicit in the nation’s decline which is to say part of the problem and in no way part of any solution.

Expand full comment

Russ, I have followed you for some time now. Essentially the difference between the news you bring and what Alex Jones says comes down to one word - documentation. You can produce documentation for most of what you tell us, he cannot. Yes it's just that simple. Keep doing what you're doing but please try not to give folks like Mr. Jones any undeserved legitimacy.

Expand full comment

I'm confirmed by other study, that there is a profound occult influence in the white house. Russ Baker's covering the topic like a boss. Thank you for your research and your careful presentation. Don't be dismayed or lose heart. Don't be dismayed by their looks. Set your face like flint. Say the message. Whether they receive it or not, you're responsible to tell it.

You have told it well. It starts before WWI, in Wellington House. See:

Engineering of Consent

(https://drwho.virtadpt.net/files/The-Engineering-of-Consent.pdf)

Crystallizing Public Opinion

https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.1607/page/n9/mode/1up

The Tavistock Institute,

https://archive.org/details/Tavistock\_201601

The Conspirators' Hierarchy - The Story of the Committee of 300

https://ia902506.us.archive.org/34/items/conspirators-hierarchy-the-story-of-the-committee-of-300-dr.-john-coleman/CIA_Coleman.-.CONSPIRATORS.HIERARCHY.-.THE.STORY.OF.THE.COMMITTEE.OF.300.R.pdf

Expand full comment

Here's a quote - of many - from "Family of Secrets" that caught my eye: "... [T]he depth and complexity of the ongoing relationship between Nixon and the [Bu$hes], a relationship that spanned nearly three decades, has somehow eluded most historians. An index search of the name [Bu$h] in the major Nixon biographies - including even those published after George H. W. [Bu$h] rose to the presidency - finds at most a handful of mentions, and in some cases, none at all.

The long overlooked Nixon-[Bu$h] story is a tale filled with plots and counterplots, power lust and ego trips, trust and betrayal, strategic alliances and rude revenge. It has a kind of mythic circularity; the elite [Bu$h] clan created the 'populist' Nixon so that a President Nixon could later play a major role in creating a [Bu$h] political dynasty. And finally, the trusted [Bu$hes] having gotten where they wanted, could play a role in Nixon's fall...."

"Family of Secrets," 2009 paperback edition, p.160.

Expand full comment

Excellent. As always. I met you at the Frontline Club in London and after reading your book couldn’t really believe nothing more came of it. But nepotism and the insulation of lies are pervasive.

Expand full comment

Fascinating, Ty!

Expand full comment

I read FAMILY OF SECRETS. It confirmed some information I knew and some I had suspected. It presented information not known but fit in with known data. The Bush family has operated in the shadows for decades.

If the truth about this family were known, they would match the Kennedys, Cuomo, Walker, Rockafellow's with their corruption. Names are named and their interconnecting cartel.

All of these families are equally corrupt.

Expand full comment

A case can be made pretty easily our leadership elite or class is by definition sociopathic.

Expand full comment